Programming and nutrition

What is periodisation?

Periodisation is the practice of organising training into phases that each carry a different emphasis, such as building volume, then intensity, then a lighter week, so that load rises over time without accumulating into injury or stagnation.

What it means for software

Periodisation is a coaching concept with one blunt software consequence: a program is not a repeating week. If the platform can only express the same seven days over and over, no amount of coaching skill can deliver a periodised plan through it.

What the platform needs to carry is modest. Phases with their own parameters, loads that change according to a rule rather than by hand, and a lighter week that arrives on schedule without a coach remembering to insert it.

Where it earns its keep, and where it does not

For members training for something specific, or for anybody who has trained long enough that simple progression has stopped working, periodisation is the difference between continued progress and a plateau.

For a beginner, it is mostly ceremony. Somebody in their first six months improves on almost any sensible plan, and the elaborate structure adds complexity to a product without adding results. Building a platform that assumes every member needs phases is a common way to make onboarding worse for the majority.

Automate the arithmetic, not the judgement

Percentage calculations, deload scheduling and progression rules are exactly what software should handle. Deciding what a member should be training for, and when to change the emphasis, is the coach's call. Platforms that automate the coaching judgement as well as the arithmetic tend to produce plans no coach will stand behind.

Questions operators ask

Four that come up on almost every call about periodisation.

Not by name. They notice that the program keeps working and that a hard block is followed by an easier week. If members are asking what phase they are in, the product is probably showing them more of the machinery than they need.

No. If your members are general-population and your programs run eight weeks with straightforward progression, phases add build cost and screen complexity for little gain. Support them when your coaching actually uses them.

Scheduled, automatic and explained. A lighter week that arrives on its own, labelled so the member understands it is deliberate, prevents the most common reaction to an easy week, which is to assume something is broken and add work.

The arithmetic can. Adjusting loads from logged performance is well-understood and works. Choosing the emphasis for a given member over the next three months is a coaching decision, and automating it tends to produce plans that are defensible on paper and wrong in the room.

Building a fitness platform?

Tell us where you are and what your members are doing. We will tell you what we would do about it.

Start a conversation